|
Grameen
Bank II
Designed to Open New Possibilities
Muhammad Yunus
October 2002
Lessons
Learnt Over Quarter of A Century
Grameen
Bank has come a long way since it began its journey in the village
of Jobra in 1976. During this quarter of a century it has faced
many operational and organisational problems, gained a lot of
experience through its successes and failures. It incorporated
many new features in its methodology to address various crises
and problems, or utilise new opportunities; discarded and modified
the features which became unnecessary or less effective. There
were a number of major natural disasters in Bangladesh during
the life span of Grameen Bank. The 1998 flood was the worst of
all. Half of the country was under flood-water for ten long weeks.
Water flowed over the roof-tops for a prolonged period.
Grameen borrowers, like many other people of Bangladesh, lost
most of their possessions including their houses because of the
flood. Grameen Bank, which is owned by the borrowers, decided
to take up a huge rehabilitation program by issuing fresh loans
for restarting income-generating activities and to repair or rebuild
their houses. Soon borrowers started to feel the burden of accumulated
loans. They found the new installment sizes exceeded their capacity
to repay. They gradually started to stay away from weekly centre
meetings. Grameen Bank repayment started to show quick decline.
We tried to improve the situation, but it did not produce desired
result. Impact of the post-flood repayment crisis was compounded
by its overlap with a recovery problem from an earlier crisis.
In 1995, a large number of our borrowers stayed away from centre
meetings and stopped paying loan installments. Husbands of the
borrowers, inspired and supported by local politicians, organised
this, demanding a change in Grameen Bank rules to allow withdrawal
of "group tax" component of "group fund" at
the time of leaving the bank. It continued for months. At the
end we resolved the problem by creating some opening in our rules,
but Grameen's repayment rate had gone down in the mean time. Many
borrowers continued to abstain from repaying their loans even
after the matter was resolved.
These external factors reinforced the internal weaknesses in
the system. The system consisted of a set of well-defined standardised
rules. No departure from these rules was allowed. Once a borrower
fell off the track, she found it very difficult to move back on,
since the rules which allowed her to return, were not easy for
her to fulfill. More and more borrowers fell off the track. Then
there was the multiplier effect. If one borrower stopped payments,
it encouraged others to follow.
Back to
the Drawing Board
When the repayment situation did not improve as desired, we thought
this would be a good opportunity to be bold, and to dare to design
a new Grameen methodology, incorporating all the lessons learnt,
and the wishes and the desires that we accumulated during the
quarter century of Grameen's operation. We debated about it. But
finally we decided in favour of it. We sat down to design it part
by part, piece by piece, then pilot-tested the system quietly
in a few branches to fine-tune the design; tried again in larger
number of branches; reworked it; and in the end, came up with
the architecture of a new system that we all liked. All the 12,000
staff participated very actively in designing the product at all
the stages of its development. Some were critical in the beginning,
but by the time it was ready, everybody loved it. The staff was
electrified with enthusiasm - because response from the borrowers
was so positive. Borrowers who did not show up at their centre
meetings for years, started showing up to talk about the new system.
Soon they were signing up to start all over again and repay the
old loans with the accumulated interest. No reduction in the debt
was offered. Still they opted to return.
The designing process formally began on April 14, 2000 (Bengali
New year's day). Field-testing began immediately. By the beginning
of 2001, the new system, "The Grameen Generalised System"
or GGS was ready for launching. We undertook an intensive staff
training program for all the 12000 staff. Initially there were
signs of reluctance from some staff. There were grumblings, negative
jokes, and expressions of frustrations. Some of it we expected,
but some we did not. Top management went ahead with understanding
and patience. Training continued cycle after cycle. Soon uneasiness
about the new system disappeared. Staff became great admirers
of the GGS and wanted to put it into immediate implementation
in their branches. All the while we were busy designing and debugging
the system, our real worry was how to manage the transition from
the Grameen Classic System (GCS) to GGS in 41,000 villages without
subjecting hundreds of thousands of illiterate borrowers to a
big shock, and messing up the accounts in 1175 branches. Transition
was very carefully and meticulously choreographed, and put into
action by March, 2001. By April, 2002, two years after we began
the process, Grameen Bank II has emerged. The transition is now
complete. The last branch of Grameen Bank switched over to Grameen
II on August 7, 2002, completing the process of transition. The
new Grameen Bank II is now a real and functioning institution.
This second generation microcredit institution appears to be much
better equipped than it was in its earlier version.
In the Grameen Bank II, gone are the general loans, seasonal loans,
family loans, and more than a dozen other types of loans; gone
is the group fund; gone is the branch-wise, zone-wise loan ceiling;
gone is the fixed size weekly installment; gone is the rule to
borrow every time for one whole year, even when the borrower needed
the loan only for three months; gone is the high-level tension
among the staff and the borrowers trying to steer away from a
dreadful event of a borrower turning into a "defaulter",
even when she is still repaying; and gone are many other familiar
features of Grameen Classic System.
Poor Always
Pay Back
Central assumption
underlying GGS still remains the same as it was behind GCS - the
firm belief that the poor people always pay back their loans.
On some occasions they may take longer time to pay back than it
was originally stipulated, but repay they will. There is no reason
for a credit institution dedicated to provide financial services
to the poor to get uptight because a borrower could not pay back
the entire amount of a loan on a date fixed at the beginning of
the disbursement of the loan. Many things can go wrong for a poor
person during the loan period. After all, the circumstances are
beyond the control of the poor people. We see no reason why the
sky should fall on anybody's head because a borrower took longer
time to pay back her loan. Since she is paying additional interest
for the extra time, where is the problem? We always advocated
that microcredit programs should not fall into the logical trap
of the conventional banking and start looking at their borrowers
as some kind of "time-bombs" who are ticking away and
waiting to create big trouble on pre-fixed dates. Please rest
assured that the poor people are not going to create any trouble.
It is us, the designers of institutions and rules, who keep creating
trouble for them. One can benefit enormously by having trust in
them, admiring their struggle for and commitment to have decent
lives for themselves. It is very easy to appreciate the architecture
of GGS if one keeps in mind this central assumption behind the
system.
The Grameen
Generalised System
GGS has been built around one prime loan product - called Basic
Loan. In addition, there are two other loan products : 1) the
housing loan, and 2) the higher education loan which run parallel
to the basic loan. All borrowers start with a basic loan (in Bangla
we call it "Shohoj" or "Easy" loan). Most
of the borrowers will continue with this basic loan, cycle after
cycle, without any difficulty, and meet all their credit needs
in the most satisfactory manner. But life does not proceed smoothly
for any human being, let alone the poor women. It is likely that
some borrowers will run into serious problems, and face difficulties,
somewhere along the cycles of loans, in repaying the basic loan
according to its repayment schedule. For them GGS has a very convenient
arrangement. In GGS, basic loan comes with an exit option. It
offers an alternative route to any borrower who needs it, without
making her feel guilty about failing to fulfill the requirement
of the basic loan. This alternative route is provided through
"Flexible Loan". In Bangla, we call it "Chukti"
i.e. "contract" or "Renegotiated" loan, because
the bank, the group, and the borrower have to go through a process
of renegotiation to arrive at a new contract with a fresh repayment
schedule for a borrower entering into the flexible loan.
Flexible loan is simply a rescheduled basic loan, with its own
set of separate rules. I have been describing the basic loan as
"Grameen micro-credit highway". As long as the borrower
keeps her schedule, she moves forward uninterrupted with ease
and comfort on the micro-credit highway. She can pick up speed
according to the rules of the highway. If she drives well she
can shift to higher and higher gear. In other words, on the Grameen
highway, a borrower can routinely upgrade her loan size at each
cycle of loan. This is done on the basis of
 |
predetermined rules. She knows ahead of time how much enhancement
in loan size is coming, and can plan her activities accordingly.
But if a borrower faces engine trouble (business slow-down or
failure, sickness, family problems, accidents, thefts, natural
disaster, etc.) and cannot keep up with the highway speed, she
has to quit the highway and take an exit on to a detour called
a "flexible loan" or "flexi-loan". This detour
will allow her a slower speed consistent with her situation. Now
she can reduce the installment size that she can afford to pay,
by extending the loan period. Taking a detour, however, does not
in any way imply that she has changed the objective of her journey.
She still proceeds with the same objective, but only through a
winding narrow road for a while. Her immediate goal is to overcome
her problems and take as short a detour as possible to get back
to the highway quickly. A borrower may be lucky and succeed in
getting back to the highway (i.e. the basic loan) quickly, or
she may have sustained problems and the best she can do is to
move from one detour to the next (i.e. moving from one flexi-loan
to the next flexi-loan, working out an easier repayment schedule
than the previous one), delaying the re-entry into the highway.
One big disincentive for a borrower to take the flexi-loan detour
is that the moment she exits from the basic loan highway, her
loan ceiling, that she has built over years, gets wiped out. When
she'll re-enter the highway after completing her detour, her loan
ceiling will have to be re-constructed. This will be nearer to
her entry-level loan ceiling than the loan ceiling she enjoyed
immediately before going into the flexi-loan.
Flexi-loan is not an independent loan. It is only a temporary
detour from the basic loan. A borrower will always make efforts
to re-enter the basic loan, because under flexi-loan a borrower
can only work within a non-expansionary loop - that is, a borrower
can borrow, only the same amount or less, cycle after cycle. Given
this unattractive feature of flexi-loan, a borrower would be working
hard to get back to the highway to enjoy its facilities. Flexi-loan
works as a shoe-horn to get a borrower back to the highway. As
soon as the initial amount of flexi-loan is repaid fully, the
borrower re-enters the highway. She carries with her all the new
loans she took while she was on flexi-loan. It normally takes
six months to two years to get back to the highway. That's not
a bad deal for a borrower who would otherwise be almost marked
for expulsion from the system. Under GGS the borrower continues
to remain a valued client all through the process of going in
and out of flexi-loan. But there is a cost factor attached to
this. Every time a borrower takes the exit from the highway the
bank will be required to make 50 per cent provision against the
amount of flexi-loan. This is an additional cost to the bank.
The bank staff will try to bring this cost to the minimum by designing
the basic loan creatively to best fit the borrower's credit need
and cash flow. GGS offers this option. This was not available
in GCS. Because of this feature of GGS, if experience tells us
that the risk of a flexi-loan becoming overdue is very small,
we can reduce the percentage of provisioning. If the percentage
of flexi-loan is rather small, say, less than 5 per cent, of the
total outstanding loan, even 50 per cent provisioning will not
show up as a big item of expenditure, compared to the usual alternative
of making provisions in a system without flexi-loan.
If a borrower cannot stay on the highway (i.e. cannot repay
the basic loan installments as per schedule), there is now no
need for the bank to trigger actions to mobilise the group and
the centre pressure on her to avert an immediate danger for the
group. By providing exit route for borrowers GGS has changed the
situation dramatically. Now both the bank and the borrowers can
be free from all tension - no more chasing of the problem-borrowers
or defaulters. Nobody needs to look at anyone with suspicion.
Group solidarity is used for forward-looking joint-actions for
building things for the future, rather than for the unpleasant
task of putting unfriendly pressure on a friend.
If a borrower fails to repay the basic loan and is unwilling
to go into the flexi-loan, she becomes a willing defaulter. If
a borrower takes the flexi-loan option and tries again and again
to repay the money, but still does not succeed, she becomes an
unwilling defaulter. Any amount of flexi-loan which does not get
paid back within two years it becomes overdue, and 100 per cent
provision is made for that amount. Amount that does not get paid
back in three years, becomes bad debt, and is written off entirely.
Under GGS loans are written off as a part of financial prudence,
but the amount is neither forgotten nor forgiven. GGS treats all
written-off loans as recoverable loans. My guess is, under GGS,
nearly 90 per cent of written-off loans and interest will ultimately
be recovered, because the borrowers will pay them back, in their
own interest, as and when opportunity arises. Poor people always
need money. Their interest is to keep the door to money open.
If this door shuts down for any reason, they'll do their best
to reopen it - if that option is available. GGS provides this
option.
There are many exciting features in GGS, but I think removing
tension from micro-credit and permanently establishing full dignity
to the poor borrowers, are the two most important features of
them all. Tension-free microcredit is a great gift of GGS. Now
both sides in the micro-credit system, the lender and the borrowers,
can enjoy micro-credit, rather than having occasional nightmares
created by one for the other.
Custom-made
Credit Service
GGS has created a methodology which
can provide custom-made credit to a poor borrower. GCS is still
a powerful methodology which demonstrated its ability to deliver
microcredit in all types of countries, economies, and cultures.
It has done its job in making microcredit a serious business.
GGS takes off from where GCS left off. GCS is a "single-size-fits-all"
kind of methodology. This feature gives GCS the simplicity which
was most needed for the implementation of an idea which was totally
unknown to the world. Now microcredit has matured. The world is
ready to afford a methodology which can provide custom-made microcredit
to the poor. GGS allows loans of any duration, such as, 3 months,
6 months, 9 months or any number of months and years. In its reduced
form it can be as simple as GCS. GCS was designed to be operated
mechanically. There is only limited scope in GCS for the exercise
of judgment by the foot-soldiers of microcredit. GGS is different.
It allows a staff to be creative. He can design his loan product
to make it a best fit for his client in terms of duration, timing
of the loan, scheduling the installment, etc. The more a staff
becomes a creative artist, the better music he can produce. The
institution can identify the levels of creativity among its staff.
GGS allows space for the growth of the staff. An initial level
user of GGS can use it almost as GCS by restricting it to one-year
loans only. As the user gathers experience he can widen the number
of options offered within GGS. Besides duration, size of weekly
installments can be varied. A borrower can pay more each week
during peak business season, and pay less during lean period.
In an extreme case, each installment can be of different size.
In the other extreme, all installments can be exactly equal, like
in GCS. An agreed repayment schedule is signed by both the lender
and the borrower, before the loan is disbursed. The borrower is
obliged to follow the schedule during the loan period. If she
fails, she is required to take the detour and move to flexible
loan.
When a borrower moves to flexi-loan she gets a second chance to
work out another repayment schedule, one that is more do-able
than the previous one. Suppose a borrower starts with a basic
loan for a duration of one year. During the loan period she develops
some problem in paying the installments according the schedule
she had committed to. No problem. She moves to flexi-loan and
converts the one-year loan into, say, a three year loan, making
the installments very small and affordable. Even if she has extended
the loan period to three years, she does not have to wait three
years to access fresh loans. In both basic and flexi-loans, a
borrower can borrow after each segment of six months is completed
as per schedule. She can borrow exactly the amount she has paid
back during the six months - it is like having a cash credit limit
with a bank. In case of flexi-loans, a borrower can borrow, after
the first six months, as much as twice the amount that she has
paid back, if she fulfils certain stringent conditions. She can
borrow exactly same amount she has paid back in each subsequent
six months.
Group Fund
Replaced
One most visible change everybody notices in GGS is the disappearance
of Group Fund. Grameen Bank had to keep on defending Group Fund
ever since it was created twenty five years back. Now we let it
go. There are no more joint accounts. Each borrower will have
three obligatory savings accounts - a) Personal savings account,
b) Special savings account, and c) Pension deposit account (obligatory
only for borrowers borrowing above Tk 8,000).
GGS continues with five percent obligatory savings, deducted from
the loan amount, at the time of disbursement. But it is no longer
called a "group tax". New name is "obligatory savings".
Half of this five percent obligatory savings goes to a personal
savings accounts, the remaining half goes to a "special savings
accounts". A borrower can withdraw any amount from her personal
savings account any time she desires. There is no restriction
on her withdrawal. Weekly saving still continues. This goes to
personal savings account. Special savings account is non-withdrawable
for the first three years. Then withdrawal is allowed generally
once in three years keeping a minimum balance of Tk 2,000 or half
the amount in the account, whichever is larger. Under special
circumstances the entire amount in the special savings account
can be withdrawn. Some money from this account will be used to
buy shares of Grameen Bank.
Pension
Fund: Leading to Financial Self-Reliance
GGS requires all borrowers with loans above Tk 8,000 (US $ 138)
to contribute a minimum of Tk 50 (US $ 0.86) each month in a pension
deposit account. After ten years a borrower will receive a guaranteed
amount which is almost double the amount she has put in during
120 months. This has become an amazingly attractive feature of
GGS for the borrowers. Many are coming forward to save more than
Tk 50 each month. There are borrowers who are saving Tk 500 per
month. While it has become popular with the borrowers, it is generating
a huge cash in-flow for the bank. Each month it is now bringing
in over Tk 100 million (US $ 1.75 million) as deposits on account
of pension savings. Grameen Bank can now rest assured that it
will have enough of its own money to expand its lending operation
in future. By the same token, branches will now have enough money
to carry out their lending programs with their own deposits. All
GB branches can look forward to becoming self-financed. While
the institution moves towards financial self-reliance, the borrowers
also move to financial self-reliance as old age approaches. They
can have monthly income at retirement out of the accumulated savings
in the Pension Fund. For a poor woman, it is a very comforting
news.
Other Savings
The new pension fund has become an important savings instrument.
GGS emphasizes on receiving deposits from both borrowers and non-borrowers.
A variety of savings products has been incorporated in the system.
Total amount of deposits account for 67 per cent of the total
outstanding loans of Grameen Bank in July, 2002, after paying
back Tk 3.3 billion (US $ 60 million) of its loans to the central
bank, local commercial banks and the foreign lenders, which fell
due during the past 18 months.
Loan Loss
Provisioning and Write-off Policy
Grameen Bank has been subjected to sharp criticism
for its provisioning and write-off policies under GCS. We always
defended ourse

lves that our policies are more generous than the standard set
by the central bank of the country. Also we find both policies
very satisfactory for the financial prudence required in our business.
GGS has made these policies still more generous. "Overdue"
is defined in a very sharp manner. If a borrower fails to repay
her installment for ten consecutive weeks, or if she fails to
repay the total amount she is required to pay within a six month
period, and she does not move into flexible loan, she becomes
a defaulter. If she becomes a defaulter, 100 per cent provisioning
must be made for the unrepaid principal and interest. Exactly
one year later, the amount must be written off. Writing off will
be done on a monthly basis, rather than at the time of annual
account closing. If a borrower is on flexible loan, generally
the same policy will hold. Fifty per cent provision must be made
for the total balance amount of flexible loan and accrued interest
on the annual closing date, even if the repayment rate of flexible
loan is 100 per cent for the whole bank.
Loan Insurance
Borrowers always worry what will happen to their debt if they
die. Will the family members pay off their debt ? They believe
that if their debt remains unrepaid after their death, their soul
cannot rest in peace. Inclusion of loan insurance program in GGS
has made them very happy. This has become another popular feature
of GGS.
The insurance program is very simple. Once a year, on the last
day of the year, the borrower is required to put in a small amount
of money in a loan insurance savings account. It is calculated
on the basis of the outstanding loan and interest of the borrower
on that day. She deposits 2.5 per cent of the outstanding amount.
If a borrower dies any time during the next year, her entire outstanding
amount is paid up by the insurance fund which is created by the
interest income of the loan insurance savings account. In addition,
her family receives back the amount she saved in the loan insurance
savings account. Borrowers find it unbelievably generous. Everybody
loves it.
If the outstanding amount remains the same on two successive
year-ends, the borrower does not have to put in any extra money
in the loan insurance savings account in the second year. Only
if the balance is more she has to put in money for the extra amount.
Even if the outstanding amount happens to be several times more
at the time of her death than what it was on the preceding year-end,
under the rules of this program, the entire amount will still
be paid off from the insurance fund.
The borrowers have good reasons to be happy.
Loan Ceiling Grows
with the Borrower
GCS operated with a loan ceiling for the whole branch. No borrower
can take a loan above the ceiling fixed for the branch. On top
of it there was a ceiling for the whole zone. Branch ceilings
were below or equal to the zone ceiling. GGS has replaced it with
a up- gradable able loan ceiling for each borrower. Under GGS
there is no ceiling for the zone, and no ceiling for the branch.
For basic loan, the ceiling is fixed each time a borrower requests
a new loan. It is calculated in two different ways. Higher amount
between the two is accepted as the ceiling. Under the first method
the ceiling is worked out on the basis of performance (regularity
in repayment, attendance in weekly meetings etc) of the borrower,
her group, and centre. Under the second method the ceiling is
fixed on the basis of the total amount of the savings (excluding
personal savings). Ceiling is equivalent to 150% of the total
savings. If a borrower has a total saving of Tk 10,000, her loan
ceiling will be Tk 15,000. There are many borrowers who have accumulated
quite a good amount of saving in their various saving accounts.
They can now take large loans too. Under the first method ceiling
can go up or down depending on the performance. For example, loan
ceiling diminishes by Tk 500 for each day of borrower's absence
in the weekly centre meeting. If the repayment record of the entire
centre is perfect, her loan ceiling goes up by a fixed percentage.
A borrower can enhance her loan size by increasing her savings,
or by making sure she, her group, and the centre do all the right
things.
In flexi-loan, a borrower has no opportunity to enhance her loan
size. She can borrow only what she has paid back, except after
the first six months, when she can borrow twice the amount she
has paid back if she fulfills some stringent conditions.
Gold Member !
Then there is the gold membership ! It is a very respectable
position to achieve. A borrower who had maintained 100 per cent
repayment record (never got off the highway!) for seven consecutive
years, is given the status of a gold member. A gold member goes
into a faster track of loan enhancement, besides getting special
honours and privileges.
Destitute
Members
To encourage destitute members to join Grameen Bank and make
them feel comfortable within Grameen Bank, GGS relaxes all the
basic rules of GB. A destitute person does not have to belong
to a group, no saving is necessary, no weekly repayment is necessary,
her loan terms are decided by her, in consultation with her mentor.
Centres will be encouraged to list destitute families in their
respective areas, groups will be encouraged to take destitute
members "under their wings" and mentor them to help
them overcome their fears and inhibitions, give them required
business skill, and help them take up income generating activities.
Bringing a destitute woman to a level where she can become a regular
member of a group will be considered as a great achievement of
a group. Groups and centres that accomplish this, will be given
special awards, privileges, and honours. In addition to loans,
GB will also offer them "venture capital" to partner
with them in their micro ventures.
Building
Capacity to Stay Out of Poverty
Studies show that Grameen borrowers are steadily moving out of
poverty. According to one study, 5 per cent of the borrowers move
out of poverty each year (Shahidur R. Khandker, 1998). GGS extends
its attention to the children of Grameen families as a part of
Grameen strategy to build capacity within families to keep them
out of poverty once they have moved out. No slipping back.
Grameen Bank has introduced higher education loans for all students
from Grameen families who can enter into the higher educational
institutions (medical schools, engineering school, universities,
professional schools, etc). Loans are given to the students directly,
without going through their parents. Student are made responsible
to repay the loans when they start earning.
Scholarships are awarded every year to the school students from
Grameen families, on a competitive basis. Half the number of scholarships
are reserved for girl students. Remaining 50 per cent is open
for both boys and girls. Each year Grameen Bank gives out 3,704
scholarships, and makes sure each branch can provide at least
one scholarship. Gradually the number of scholarships will be
increased as more and more students are available to compete for
these scholarships.
Computerization
of Grameen Accounting and Monitoring System
GGS got a big boost from a new program to computerise the branch
level accounting and MIS for all the branches. It is being done
through setting up of "Information Management Centre"
at the area level. All information from the branches are fed into
the computers located at the area office. Branch staff is freed
from the heavy load of book-keeping and filling-in of the MIS
blanks. Now that computer does all the work, staff can concentrate
on improving the quality of lives of the borrowers. 67 per cent
of the branches are now computerised. By the end of 2002, this
percentage will rise to 85 or more.
Since many branches are connected by mobile phones, we are looking
forward to taking the next logical step to integrate the entire
information system through intranet. Already most of the zones
are connected with each other and the head office through intranet.
Five Star
Branches !
I have never seen Grameen staff charged with so
much enthusiasm and energy, than what I noticed after the introduction
of GGS. You just can't stop them. They were all captivated by the
idea of creating Grameen II. This is now done. Grameen II has brought
tension-free microcredit. Grameen's repayment rate is now over 98
per cent. Staff energy level is at the peak. Every time you talk
to them they appear as if they are having the biggest fun of their
lives, working for Grameen.
One feature of GGS that really caught their imagination
is the idea of creating Five Star branches. Each staff wants to
create his/her own five star branch. Under GGS a branch earns a
colour-coded star for one particular achievement. If a branch has
100 per cent repayment record it is awarded a star - a green star.
Eligible staff of a star-winning branch can put on a badge displaying
this star on his dress. If a branch earns profit, it is awarded
a blue star. A branch having more in deposits than their outstanding
loans, gets a violet star. If all the children of the borrowers
are in school or completed at-least primary school, the branch gets
a brown star. If all borrowers of a branch cross over the poverty
line, the branch gets a red star. Each staff can earn his stars
even when the branch is yet to receive any star, by simply fulfilling
the same conditions for the centres for which he is responsible.
A Grameen staff proudly displays his stars on
formal occasions. Looking at the colours of the stars one can easily
figure out the area of his accomplishments. Those who got one star,
are working hard to get the second star. Those who do not have any
star at all, are working very hard to get to their first star. It
has generated a burst of energy all around. They are not doing it
for any monetary benefit, they are doing it in the spirit of competition
- to be ahead of their peers, to create a record for his branch,
or area, or zone, to make a personal contribution in changing the
economic and social condition of the poor families he is working
for, and, above all, to prove their worth to themselves. It is fun
to watch them. Observing this phenomenon, one cannot but wonder
how one environment makes people despair and sit idle, and then
by changing the frame conditions one can transform the same people
into matchless performers.
Now looking back I feel that it was lucky for us
that Grameen was faced with a crisis. This crisis led us to create
Grameen II, which has the built-in capacity to handle crises and
disasters in a much better way than ever before. Under normal conditions,
GGS is not only a powerful and efficient system, capable of providing
custom-made financial services to support the economic and social
upliftment of each individual borrower family, but also it frees
micro-credit from the usual stresses and strains.
Welcome Grameen Bank II.
Congratulations to the Grameen staff who created it.
|
Update : August, 2002
|
| Savings in Pension Fund (GPS) |
Tk 2,074 million
|
| Savings in Loan Insurance Account |
Tk 185 million
|
| Ratio of Savings to Outstanding |
67 per cent
|
Ratio of Savings and Own
Resources to Outstanding
|
89 per cent
|
Number of Branches with More in
Savings than in Outstanding Loans
|
200
|
| Repayment Rate |
98.45 per cent
|
| Number of Branches with Computerized Accounting
and MIS |
789
|
| Number of Branches with one or more stars |
507
|
| Total no. of stars earned by 507 branches |
878
|
| Total Number of Branches |
1,175
|
| Current Exchange Rate for US$ |
Tk 57.90
|
"Originally
published in the Grameen Dialogue, in April, 2002. This revised
and updated edition is published in October, 2002."
|