 |
 |
 |
 |
Summing
up Grameen Trust's Decade of Experience
Replication is a Doable Thing |
 |
 |
 |
 |
H.
I. Latifee
Essential principles
of Grameen are replicable anywhere in the world, where there is
poverty and there are poor people struggling hard for their survival
and development.
Operation of
more than 400 Grameen replications in 22 countries of Africa, 19
in Asia, 3 in Oceania, 15 in the Americas and 7 in Europe is a clear
manifestation of the fact that Grameen approach has been widely
accepted as a model for poverty alleviation irrespective of the
level of development, differences in languages, culture, race and
density of population.
Grameen Trust
(GT) as a provider of financial and technical assistance has directly
supported 105 Grameen Bank Replication Projects in 34 countries.
It is apparent from the off-site and on-site monitoring reports
of GT that its partners have made a significant progress in terms
of their outreach, loan disbursement, loan products, savings, socio-economic
impact and attaining operating and financial self-sufficiency. From
only a few thousand borrowers ten years ago, GT partners now total
about 800,000 families, directly benefiting 4 million of their family
members. Together they have plans to reach 10 million of the poorest
households by the year 2005, which is one tenth of the global target
set by the Micro-credit Summit Campaign.
GT partners
have so far disbursed more than $ 180 million as loans and generated
about $ 15 million as savings. They have sustained a high repayment
rate, including projects which have a perfect 100% repayment record.
Clientele of most of the partners are overwhelmingly women.
The leading
partners such as PROMUJER in Bolivia, RDI in China, ASA, CFTS and
SHARE in India, MKEJ in Indinesia, KRT-WID in Kyrghyzstan, CSD and
NIRDHAN in Nepal, LAPO in Nigeria, KASHF in Pakistan, ASHI, CARD
and PD in the Philippines and PTF in Tanzania, have already distinguished
themselves in the micro-credit world because of their pioneering
work and excellent performance. Although, most of the replication
partners are working in rural areas, some of them are also working
in urban slums in cities like Dhaka, Chittagong, Manila, Jakarta,
Addis Ababa, Kampala, New York, Chicago and Dallas. The prospect
of urban replications appears to be bright because of instant marketing
facilities and the higher entrepreneurial skills of the borrowers.
The replication
projects in Kosovo and Myanmar are also doing very good. These two
projects are directly implemented by GT under its Build, Operate
and Transfer (BOT) model. They are serving exclusively the poor
women and enjoying 100 per cent repayment.
Evaluation studies
show that the GT partners are striving to cover their cost of operation
from their interest income. Many have already reported financial
viability for branch level operations. A few of them have reported
institutional viability as well. Others are trying to narrow down
the gap between their cost and returns and working on their business
plans to reach the break even point as soon as possible.
It is evident
from evaluation reports and case studies that the impact of replications
in terms of accumulation of capital, generation of employment, improvement
of income and overall quality of life of their borrowers has been
quite impressive.
What are the
principal constraints?
Although Grameen replications have grown rapidly, their future expansion
and impact would be mainly constrained by the following reasons:
Lack of targeting
 |
Grameen
is a target oriented program. If targeting is not properly done,
it is very difficult to establish and maintain credit discipline.
If non-poor get into the program, the program is bound to be
in trouble. And that's what is happening with some replications
which are not sufficiently careful about targeting. |
Still very
limited funds are available
 |
For
many replicators, the sources of funds are donor and philanthropic
organizations. They have no access to large commercial sources.
They do not get the required funds and at the time their need
is urgent. |
Unfavorable
macro policies
 |
Grameen
replications have come to the present level of development mainly
because of NGO initiatives. In many cases their growth has been
hampered because of unfavorable macro level policies of the
government and unnecessary political interventions. Regulations
which will facilitate micro-credit are required to foster as
well as speed up new programs |
Natural disasters
 |
The
poor have a weak economic base and are particularly vulnerable
to natural disasters like floods, tornado, drought, etc. Their
asset base is destroyed. Investments are lost. Working capital
is eaten up. As a consequence, they lose their income and fall
back into poverty, quite frequently being unable to repay their
loans. |
No business
plans
 |
For
sustainable replications, every micro-credit organization should
have its own realistic business plan. But in practice many organizations
who are engaged in micro-credit operations have no business
plans. They do not know in concrete terms what their business
goals are, how and when they want to achieve their goals. |
Conclusions
 |
Given
the constraints, it is high time for micro-credit practitioners
to follow a course of action that will ensure the healthy growth
of micro-credit operations. Generating more funds, learning
by doing, setting standards, creating enabling conditions, developing
professional staff and promoting committed leadership, are all
needed to help replications to grow on a sustainable basis.
This is undoubtedly a challenging task. |
Grameen Trust
and its partners are intensively engaged in finding ways to meet
the challenge. We in Grameen Trust, hope that with the committed
and concerted efforts of all concerned, micro-credit movement around
the world will succeed in achieving the global target of reaching
100 million of the poorest households, particularly the women of
these families, by 2005.
The
author is the Managing Director of Grameen Trust.
|